Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Ojone Ofagbor

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), first introduced in the 1970s as a minimally invasive alternative to open stone surgery, is now the gold standard for managing large and complex renal calculi. Its core principle—percutaneous access to the renal collecting system for stone removal—remains unchanged, but nearly every aspect of the procedure has evolved through advances in technology, miniaturisation, and safety optimisation. This overview summarises the current role of PCNL in nephrolithiasis management and highlights recent developments such as miniaturised techniques, suction-assisted systems, laser lithotripsy, and image-guided navigation. It also examines how these innovations have improved stone-free rates, efficiency, and safety across diverse patient groups.

The Current Role of PCNL in Nephrolithiasis Management

Historical Evolution

Since its introduction under radiologic guidance in the 1970s, PCNL has replaced open anatrophic nephrolithotomy for most large-stone cases. It is now the preferred treatment for patients with large stone burdens, complex anatomy, or stones resistant to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or ureteroscopy (URS).

Indications for PCNL

Both the European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urological Association (AUA) recommend PCNL as first-line therapy for: 

Stone Size and Burden

  • >20 mm: Gold standard; highest likelihood of single-session clearance.

  • Staghorn calculi: Most effective and often the only feasible option, sometimes requiring multiple tracts or staged procedures.

  • 10–20 mm: Considered when SWL or RIRS have low expected success, especially in the lower pole or with dense/unfavourable stones.

Stone Location and Anatomy

  • Lower pole stones >10 mm: PCNL preferred when infundibular anatomy reduces SWL efficacy.

  • Anomalous kidneys: Safe and effective in horseshoe, ectopic, and malrotated kidneys with adjusted access techniques.

  • Special populations: Mini-PCNL variants are well-suited for children, obese patients, solitary kidneys, and those with urinary diversions.

Patient-Related Factors

  • Comorbidities: Can be performed supine or under regional anaesthesia for patients with cardiopulmonary risk.

  • Infection: Active infection is a contraindication; urine must be sterilised preoperatively.

Comparative Effectiveness

PCNL achieves higher stone-free rates than SWL or RIRS for large and complex stones, with fewer secondary procedures required. Although associated with slightly higher complication risks, mini-PCNL has demonstrated superior clearance for 10–20 mm lower pole stones compared with SWL and RIRS.

Expanding Indications

Miniaturisation and improved imaging have broadened PCNL’s use to:

  • Smaller stones

  • Paediatric patients

  • Challenging anatomies (e.g., horseshoe, ectopic, or transplanted kidneys)

It is now routinely and safely performed across both adult and paediatric populations with technique modifications to reduce morbidity.


Traditional Standard PCNL Technique and Outcomes

Standard Technique

The classic PCNL involves:

  1. Preoperative Imaging: Non-contrast CT for stone mapping, anatomy, and surgical planning.
  2. Patient Positioning: Traditionally prone, but supine and modified positions are increasingly used. Galdakao-Modified Valdivia position combines supine and lithotomy, allowing simultaneous ureteroscopic and percutaneous access. while the Lateral/Flank position Used in select cases, especially in Paediatric or complex anatomy.
  3. Access: Percutaneous puncture of the desired calyx under fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound guidance.
  4. Tract Dilation: Serial or balloon dilation to 24–30 Fr, followed by placement of a rigid nephroscope.
  5. Stone Fragmentation: Pneumatic, ultrasonic, or laser lithotripsy.
  6. Fragment Retrieval: Graspers, baskets, or suction.
  7. Exit Strategy: Placement of a nephrostomy tube, stent, or tubeless approach.

Outcomes

  • Stone-Free Rates: 85–95% for large stones, higher for single stones and lower for staghorn or complex stones.
  • Complications: Bleeding (transfusion rates 3–6%), fever (10–16%), sepsis (0.5–2%), injury to adjacent organs (rare), and urinary leakage.
  • Hospital Stay: Traditionally 2–4 days, but decreasing with tubeless and ambulatory approaches.

Limitations

Standard PCNL, while highly effective, is associated with greater morbidity—particularly bleeding and longer recovery—compared to Miniaturised techniques, prompting the development of less invasive variants.

Advances in PCNL

  1. Miniaturized PCNL
  • Mini-PCNL (14–20 Fr): Balances efficacy with reduced bleeding and pain.
  • Ultra-mini-PCNL (11–13 Fr): Suited for moderate stones; less invasive.
  • Micro-PCNL (4.8 Fr): Needle puncture with laser lithotripsy; ideal for small stones.
  • Impact: Lower morbidity, outpatient feasibility, tailored to stone size.
  1. Energy Sources
  • Laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG, Thulium fiber): Precise fragmentation, effective for hard stones.
  • Combination devices: Ultrasound + suction systems improve clearance and reduce operative time.
  1. Suction-Assisted Technologies
  • Continuous aspiration during lithotripsy improves visibility, reduces intrarenal pressure, and lowers infection risk.
  1. Imaging and Navigation
  • Ultrasound-guided access: Minimizes radiation exposure.
  • CT-based planning: Improves accuracy in complex anatomy.
  • Robotic and computer-assisted navigation: Emerging tools for precision puncture and tract creation.
  1. Tubeless and Ambulatory PCNL
  • Selected patients discharged same day with no nephrostomy tube.

Reduced pain, faster recovery, lower healthcare costs.

Feature Standard PCNL Mini-PCNL (mPCNL) Ultra-Mini PCNL Super-Mini PCNL Micro-PCNL
Tract Size ≥24Fr 14–22Fr 11–13Fr 10–14Fr 4.85Fr
Visualisation Rigid nephroscope Mini nephroscope 6Fr scope Mini nephroscope Micro-optic camera
Fragment Retrieval Yes Yes Yes Yes (with suction) No (retrograde clearance)
Lithotripsy Pneumatic/Ultrasonic Laser/Ultrasonic Laser Laser + suction Holmium laser
Stone Size Indication >20 mm 15–40 mm <20 mm <25 mm <20 mm
Blood Loss Higher Lower Minimal Minimal Minimal
Hospital Stay Longer Shorter Shorter Shorter Shorter
Stone-Free Rate High Comparable 87% 90% 89%

Advanced Navigation Technologies

 

  • Endovision (Endoscopic-Assisted Puncture): Flexible ureteroscope visualises the collecting system during puncture, enhancing safety and precision.
  • Optical Puncture Needles: Incorporate micro-cameras for direct visualisation of entry into the collecting system, eliminating fluoroscopy in select cases.
  • Electromagnetic (EM) Tracking: Real-time 3D needle guidance using EM sensors, enabling precise, radiation-free access; early clinical studies show high first-attempt success rates.
  • 3D CT and Mixed Reality (MR) Navigation: Preoperative CT data is used to create 3D models or holograms, which are overlaid intraoperatively to guide puncture; studies show improved accuracy and reduced radiation exposure.
  • Robotic-Assisted Access: Robotic arms (e.g., MONARCH platform) with EM or fluoroscopic guidance automate needle targeting, flattening the learning curve and improving reproducibility, especially for less experienced surgeons.
  • 5G-Powered Teleultrasound: Remote expert guidance using robotic ultrasound probes and real-time audiovisual feedback, expanding access to expertise in remote or resource-limited settings.

Access Techniques: Fluoroscopic Triangulation, Bullseye, Ultrasound-Guided, Endoscopic-Assisted

Fluoroscopic Techniques

  • Triangulation: Uses biplanar fluoroscopy to align the needle trajectory and depth, reducing torque and optimising access.
  • Bullseye: Aligns the needle as a radiographic dot over the target calyx, advancing directly; easy to teach and reproducible.

Ultrasound-Guided Access

  • Advantages: Avoids radiation, visualises adjacent organs, and is especially useful in children and pregnant patients.
  • Limitations: Operator-dependent, challenging in obese or non-dilated systems, and may require a longer learning curve.

Endoscopic-Assisted Puncture

  • Technique: Flexible ureteroscope is used to visualise the collecting system and guide needle entry, enhancing safety and facilitating complex access.

Advanced Navigation

  • EM Tracking, MR, and Robotic Systems: Provide real-time 3D guidance, improving accuracy and reducing complications, especially in challenging anatomies.

Tract Dilation Methods and Sheath Technologies

Dilation Techniques

  • Serial Dilation: Stepwise dilation using fascial or metal dilators; traditional, reliable, but time-consuming and associated with more blood loss.
  • One-Shot Dilation: Single-step dilation to target size; reduces access and fluoroscopy time, with similar safety and efficacy to serial dilation.
  • Balloon Dilation: Radial expansion minimises shearing forces, potentially reducing bleeding; costlier and may be less effective in scarred tissue.

Sheath Technologies

  • Standard Sheaths: 24–30 Fr, rigid, allow passage of large nephroscopes and instruments.
  • Miniaturised Sheaths: 8–22 Fr, compatible with Miniaturised scopes and laser fibres.
  • Suction-Assisted Sheaths: Integrated suction channels (e.g., ClearPetra) for continuous evacuation of fragments and irrigation fluid.

Comparative Outcomes

Meta-analyses show that one-shot dilation reduces access and fluoroscopy time and postoperative haemoglobin drop, with no difference in SFR or complication rates compared to serial dilation. Balloon and metal dilators have similar safety profiles, with choice often dictated by surgeon preference and patient anatomy.

Exit Strategies: Tubeless, Totally Tubeless, Stented, Nephrostomy Tube, and Ambulatory PCNL

Traditional Approach

  • Nephrostomy Tube: Routinely placed for drainage, haemostasis, and access for second-look procedures; associated with increased pain and longer hospital stay.

Tubeless PCNL

  • Technique: Omission of nephrostomy tube, with or without placement of a ureteral stent or catheter.
  • Advantages: Shorter hospital stay, reduced pain, faster recovery, and lower analgesic requirements.
  • Safety: Comparable complication rates to standard PCNL in appropriately selected patients (no significant bleeding, collecting system injury, or residual stones).

Totally Tubeless PCNL

  • Technique: No nephrostomy tube, stent, or catheter.
  • Outcomes: Similar SFR and complication rates, with faster return to normal activity and improved postoperative pain scores in some studies.

Ambulatory and Day-Case PCNL

  • Feasibility: Enabled by Miniaturisation, tubeless techniques, and improved perioperative care.
  • Outcomes: Large series report SFRs of ~80–90%, minor complication rates <3%, and readmission rates of 2–4%.
  • Selection Criteria: Careful patient selection is critical; exclusion of high-risk cases (e.g., active infection, coagulopathy, complex anatomy).

Complications, Safety, and Infection/Sepsis Risk Mitigation Strategies

 

Complication Profile

  • Bleeding: Most common major complication; risk increases with larger tracts, multiple accesses, and complex stones. Miniaturisation reduces transfusion rates to <2%.
  • Infection/Sepsis: Postoperative fever (8–15%), sepsis (0.5–3%). Risk factors include positive preoperative urine culture, staghorn stones, diabetes, and prolonged operative time.
  • Visceral Injury: Rare (<1%), but includes colon, pleura, and adjacent organ injury; minimised by careful imaging and access planning.

Infection Prevention

  • Preoperative Urine Sterilisation: Mandatory; treat positive cultures with targeted antibiotics until sterile.
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Single-dose prophylaxis is sufficient for low-risk patients; extended courses may benefit high-risk groups (e.g., staghorn stones, prior infection).
  • Intraoperative Cultures: Renal pelvic or stone cultures may better predict postoperative infection than bladder urine cultures; discordance is common.
  • Intrarenal Pressure Management: Suction-assisted sheaths and careful irrigation reduce the risk of pyelovenous backflow and sepsis.

Bleeding Mitigation

  • Miniaturisation: Smaller tracts reduce parenchymal injury and transfusion rates.
  • Tranexamic Acid: Off-label use may reduce transfusion requirements in high-risk cases.

Other Strategies

  • Judicious Tract Selection: Minimise the number and size of tracts.
  • Careful Dilation: One-shot or balloon dilation may reduce bleeding compared to serial dilation.
  • Postoperative Monitoring: Early detection and management of complications, including imaging and laboratory surveillance.
ClearPetra access sheath

Future Directions and Ongoing Trials/Registries in PCNL

Ongoing Registries and Trials

  • STUMPS Registry: Global prospective registry evaluating suction mini-PCNL, providing real-world data on equipment, strategies, and outcomes.
  • FANS Registry: Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Ureteroscopy registry, comparing suction-assisted RIRS and PCNL.
  • Robotic Trials: Ongoing studies evaluating robotic-assisted access, navigation, and integration with AI for improved precision and safety.

Technological Innovations

  • 3D Navigation and Mixed Reality: Integration of preoperative imaging, real-time navigation, and holographic overlays to enhance access accuracy and reduce complications.
  • Artificial Intelligence: AI-driven planning and intraoperative support for access, stone clearance prediction, and complication risk stratification.
  • Advanced Lithotripsy: Development of more efficient and safer laser systems (e.g., TFL, Moses technology) and automated suction devices.

Standardization and Reporting

  • Outcome Reporting: International efforts (e.g., IAU checklist) to standardize reporting of PCNL outcomes, complications, and procedural details to facilitate benchmarking and research.

Conclusion

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains the cornerstone of surgical management for large and complex renal stones. The field has witnessed a paradigm shift toward Miniaturisation, technological innovation, and patient-centered care. Mini-PCNL, ultra-mini, super-mini, and micro-PCNL have expanded the indications for percutaneous stone surgery, offering high stone-free rates with reduced morbidity across adult and Paediatric populations. Suction-assisted devices, advanced lithotripsy technologies, and image-guided navigation systems have further enhanced procedural efficiency, safety, and outcomes. Ambulatory and day-case PCNL are now feasible for selected patients, reducing healthcare costs and improving patient satisfaction.

Ongoing registries and technological advances—particularly in navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence—promise to further refine PCNL, democratize access to expertise, and standardise outcomes. The future of PCNL lies in individualised, minimally invasive, and technologically integrated care, ensuring optimal outcomes for patients with nephrolithiasis across the globe.

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.